Chapter 1 Results from One-Variable Calculus

1.1 The Real Number System

1.1.1.

Referring only to the field axioms, show that for all .

Proof:

Use (m2), (d1), (a2), (m2), we have

Let be the additive inverse of , then

So

1.1.2.

Prove that in every ordered field, is positive. Prove that the complex number field cannot be made an ordered field.

Proof:

If , then given , . Then .

Now we assume . If , then . Then note

So from (o3), , we have a contradiction. Then .

For the second part.

if , then , we have a contradiction.

if , then , we have a contradiction again.

1.1.3

Use a completeness property of the real number system to show that 2 has a positive square root.

Proof:

Let

is not empty, e.g. . is upper bounded, e.g. is an upper bound.

Now assume is the least upper bound.

If , then let . We can find such that , then

That means , so is not an upper bound, we have a contradiction.

If , then let . We can find such that , then

That means is an upper bound of . So is not the least upper bound.

Then we have to have .

1.1.4.

(a) Prove by induction that

Proof: When ,

Assume when this is correct

So when , it's still correct.

(b) (Bernoulli’s inequality) For every real number , prove that

Proof: It's correct when .

So it's correct for all .

(c) For what positive integers is ?

Proof:

Note when

Assume

1.1.5.

(a) Use the induction theorem to show that for every natural number , the sum and the product are again natural for every natural number . Thus is closed under addition and multiplication, and consequently so is .

Proof: skip

(b) Which of the field axioms continue to hold for the natural numbers?

Solution:

The following does not hold:

(a3) Existence of additive inverses

(m3) Existence of multiplicative inverses

(c) Which of the field axioms continue to hold for the integers?

The following does not hold:

(m3) Existence of multiplicative inverses

1.1.6.

For every positive integer , let denote the set with the usual operations of addition and multiplication carried out taking remainders on division by . That is, add and multiply in the usual fashion but subject to the additional condition that . For example, in we have and . For what values of n does form a field?

Solution:

If is a composite number, and assume . If has a multiplication inverse , then

So , but and , so , we have a contradiction. So does not have a multiplication inverse, then is not a field.

If is prime number, and , then . We can find such that . So

Then is the multiplication inverse of .

is a field.

1.2 Foundational and Basic Theorems

1.2.1.

Use the intermediate value theorem to show that 2 has a positive square root.

1.3

1.3.1.

(a) Let . What is the st-degree Taylor polynomial for the function at ? (The reason for the strange indexing here is that every second term of the Taylor polynomial is .) Prove that is equal to the limit of as , similarly to the argument in the text for . Also find for at , and explain why the argument for shows that is the limit of its even-degree Taylor polynomials as well.

Solution

The Taylor remainder is

For

(b) Many years ago, the author’s high-school physics textbook asserted, bafflingly, that the approximation is good for up to . Deconstruct.

Solution:

in terms of radius is .

And we have

So the error with is less than .

1.3.2.

What is the th-degree Taylor polynomial for the following functions at ?

(a) . (This exercise is not just a matter of routine mechanics. One way to proceed involves the geometric series, and another makes use of the factorization

Solution:

Here are steps in Understanding Analysis

First, we know

Note the following geometric series converges in .

We replace with and get

Now take anti-differentiation on both side:

This is the th-degree Taylor polynomial for .

(b) where . (Although the answer can be written in a uniform way for all , it behaves differently when . Introduce the generalized binomial coefficient symbol

to help produce a tidy answer.)

Solution:

So

1.3.3.

(a) Further tighten the numerical estimate of from this section by reasoning as follows. As n increases, the Taylor polynomials add terms of decreasing magnitude and alternating sign. Therefore underestimates . Now that we know this, it is useful to find the smallest possible value of the remainder (by setting rather than in the formula). Then lies between plus this smallest possible remainder value and plus the largest possible remainder value, obtained in the section. Supply the numbers, and verify by machine that the tighter estimate of is correct.

Solution:

And we also have

And we can plug into the above equation. So we have

We calculate ,

Which is indeed than the lower bound obtained in the book, which is .

(b) In Figure 1.1, identify the graphs of through and the graph of near and near .

Solution: It's easy to see is a straight line.

Now focus on . From part (a), we know and .

Then focus on , notice

No matter of , it is always positive, so

.

1.3.4.

Working by hand, use the third-degree Taylor polynomial for at to approximate a decimal representation of . Also compute the decimal representation of an upper bound for the error of the approximation. Bound between two decimal representations.

Solution:

And also

With calculator, .

1.3.5.

Use a second-degree Taylor polynomial to approximate . Use Taylor’s theorem to find a guaranteed accuracy of the approximation and thus to find upper and lower bounds for .

Solution:

Consider

So we have

The remainder is:

Then we have

Finally, we have

1.3.6.

(a) Another proof of Taylor’s Theorem uses the fundamental theorem of integral calculus once and then integrates by parts repeatedly. Begin with the hypotheses of Theorem 1.3.3, and let . By the fundamental theorem,

Let and , so that the integral is , and integrating by parts gives

So

Now let and ,

So

Then we can use induction and assume

Let

No mattern is even or odd, So

Whereas the expression for in Theorem 1.3.3 is called the Lagrange form of the remainder, this exercise has derived the integral form of the remainder. Use the extreme value theorem and the intermediate value theorem to derive the Lagrange form of the remainder from the integral form.

Proof:

We want to estimate

Assume , and let

Note , so

i.e.

Since is continuous, with extreme value theorem, we can find .

Then with intermediate value theorem, we can find , such that , i.e.

(b) Use the integral form of the remainder to show that

Proof:

So

Consider, , and .

So

Then

The book has proved the case for . Then we can conclude