Chapter 05 The Derivative
5.2 Derivatives and the Intermediate Value Property
5.2.1.
Supply proofs for parts (i) and (ii) of Theorem 5.2.4.
(i)
Proof:
(ii)
Proof:
5.2.2.
Exactly one of the following requests is impossible. Decide which it is, and provide examples for the other three. In each case, let’s assume the functions are defined on all of .
(a) Functions and not differentiable at zero but where is differentiable at zero.
Solution: Consider .
(b) A function not differentiable at zero and a function differentiable at zero where is differentiable at zero.
Solution: Consider , and .
(c) A function not differentiable at zero and a function differentiable at zero where is differentiable at zero.
Solution: this is not possible. .
(d) A function differentiable at zero but not differentiable at any other point.
Solution: Consider a modified version of modified Dirichlet function.
5.2.3.
(a) Use Definition 5.2.1 to produce the proper formula for the derivative of h(x) = 1/x.
Proof:
So .
(b) Combine the result in part (a) with the Chain Rule (Theorem 5.2.5) to supply a proof for part (iv) of Theorem 5.2.4.
Proof: the part (iv) of Theorem 5.2.4 is this:
Here is the proof:
So
(c) Supply a direct proof of Theorem 5.2.4 (iv) by algebraically manipulating the difference quotient for in a style similar to the proof of Theorem 5.2.4 (iii).
Proof:
So
5.2.4.
Follow these steps to provide a slightly modified proof of the Chain Rule.
(a) Show that a function is differentiable at if and only if there exists a function which is continuous at and satisfies
Proof:
Assume is differentiable at , let
Then we have
So is continuous at .
- When , .
- When , .
If there exists a function which is continuous at and satisfies
Then
So is differentiable at .
(b) Use this criterion for differentiability (in both directions) to prove Theorem 5.2.5.
Proof: is differentiable at , we can find a function such that where
So we have
5.2.5.
Let
For which values of is continuous at zero?
Solution:
- For , , so is continuous at zero.
- For , , so is not continuous at zero.
- For , , so is not continuous at zero.
(b) For which values of is differentiable at zero? In this case, is the derivative function continuous?
Solution:
So * For , , so is differentiable at zero. Further more, the derivative function is also continuous. * For , , so is not differentiable at zero.
(c) For which values of is twice-differentiable?
Solution: we can use the same analysis and see , then is twice-differentiable.
5.2.6.
Let be defined on an interval , and let .
(a) Explain why in Definition 5.2.1 could have been given by
Proof: the Definition 5.2.1 is
For any given we can find such that , so
when , we have . So
(b) Assume is open. If is differentiable at , show
Proof: Similar to (a), we can show
So
5.2.7.
Let
Find a particular (potentially noninteger) value for a so that
(a) is differentiable on but such that is unbounded on .
Solution:
Then will be good for this case.
(b) is differentiable on with continuous but not differentiable at zero.
When ,
So, is continuous at 0 because
But
So is not differentiable at 0.
(c) is differentiable on and is differentiable on but is not continuous at zero.
When
Then does not exist.
5.2.8.
Review the definition of uniform continuity (Definition 4.4.4). Given a differentiable function , let’s say that is uniformly differentiable on if, given there exists a such that
whenever .
(a) Is uniformly differentiable on ? How about ?
Solution:
So is uniformly differentiable.
So is not uniformly differentiable.
(b) Show that if a function is uniformly differentiable on an interval , then the derivative must be continuous on .
Proof: Assume is uniformly differentiable on an interval , then for any , we can find such that
So , then is continuous on .
(c) Is there a theorem analogous to Theorem 4.4.7 for differentiation? Are functions that are differentiable on a closed interval necessarily uniformly differentiable?
Proof: Again we consider
and
is not continuous at 0, so is not uniformly differentiable.
5.2.9.
Decide whether each conjecture is true or false. Provide an argument for those that are true and a counterexample for each one that is false.
(a) If exists on an interval and is not constant, then must take on some irrational values.
Proof: True. It's theorem 5.2.7 (Darboux's Theorem).
(b) If exists on an open interval and there is some point where , then there exists a -neighborhood around in which for all .
Solution: False. Consider
So when , .
(c) If is differentiable on an interval containing zero and if , then it must be that .
Proof: This proof is not correrct. I think I miss this part. * I want to prove is uniformly differentiable around , i.e. given we can find such that .
And . We also have
Then as long as is small enough, and can be arbitrarily close.
We also have as long as is small enough, can be arbitrarily close .
As long as is small enough, can be arbitrarily close .
So it's impossible that .
5.2.10.
Recall that a function is increasing on whenever in . A familiar mantra from calculus is that a differentiable function is increasing if its derivative is positive, but this statement requires some sharpening in order to be completely accurate.
Show that the function
is differentiable on and satisfies . Now, prove that is not increasing over any open interval containing .
Proof: from 5.2.9 (b), we have
So . Consider , . So for small .
5.2.11.
Assume that is differentiable on and satisfies .
(a) Show that there exists a point where , and a point where .
Proof: See my proof of Theorem 5.2.7.
(b) Now complete the proof of Darboux’s Theorem started earlier.
Proof: See my proof of Theorem 5.2.7.
5.2.12 (Inverse functions).
If is one-to-one, then there exists an inverse function defined on the range of given by where . In Exercise 4.5.8 we saw that if f is continuous on , then is continuous on its domain. Let’s add the assumption that is differentiable on with for all . Show is differentiable with
Proof: Let , and assume and . We want to prove , i.e.
First we show give , we can find , if , then . We can refer to Exercise 4.5.8 to show and is monotone function first. We can prove this directly. Given sequence , and , since is bounded, we can find subsequence that converges to . Since is continuous, , is not 1 to 1, we have a contradiction.
Next, given , we show we can find , such that, ,
5.3 The Mean Value Theorems
5.3.1.
Recall from Exercise 4.4.9 that a function is Lipschitz on if there exists an such that
for all in .
(a) show is differentiable on a closed interval and if is continuous on , then is Lipschitz on .
Proof: Since is continuous on , based on Extreme Value Theorem, let is the maximum of .
Then apply the Mean Value Theorem, we have
(b) Review the definition of a contractive function in Exercise 4.3.11. If we add the assumption that on , does it follow that is contractive on this set?
Proof: Since is continuous on , we have , then is contractive on this set.
Furthermore, we can even remove the assumption that is continuous. Assume given any , we can find
5.3.2.
Let be differentiable on an interval . If on , show that is one-to-one on . Provide an example to show that the converse statement need not be true.
Proof: If , then we can find such that
then we have a contradiction, so is one-to-one on .
A example is . We have . But is still one-to-one on .
5.3.3.
Let be a differentiable function defined on the interval , and assume that , and .
(a) Argue that there exists a point where .
Proof: let , is continuous function on . and , according to Intermediate Value Property, we can find such that , so .
(b) Argue that at some point we have
Proof: Based on Mean Value theorem, we can find such that
(c) Argue that at some point in the domain.
Proof: Let .
We don't know what .
* , then .
, then .
, then .
Whatever the case, we can find some such that . Since is continuous, we can find .
Then
5.3.4.
Let be differentiable on an interval containing zero, and assume is a sequence in with and .
(a) If for all ,show and .
Proof: Since is continuous, we have , so .
We also have
(b) Add the assumption that is twice-differentiable at zero and show that as well.
Proof:
For , according to mean value theorem, we can find , such that
As a result, we can find such that . So we use (a) and we can conclude as well.
5.3.5.
(a) Supply the details for the proof of Cauchy’s Generalized Mean Value Theorem (Theorem 5.3.5).
Proof: Let
Then
and
So , so we can find , such that , i.e.
Then
(b) Give a graphical interpretation of the Generalized Mean Value Theorem analogous to the one given for the Mean Value Theorem at the beginning of Section 5.3. (Consider and as parametric equations for a curve.)
Solution: Consdier a curve . At a point , the derivative is
5.3.6.
(a) Let be differentiable, , and for all . Show for all .
Proof: When , .
When , from Mean value theorem
So
(b) Let be twice differentiable, and for all . Show for all .
Proof: This time we need to use Generalized Mean Value Theorem. Let
From (a) we know .
So
(c) Conjecture and prove an analogous result for a function that is differentiable three times on .
Solution: the conjecture should be like this:
Let be three times differentiable, and for all . Show for all .
Proof: We already know . And let .
So .
5.3.7.
A fixed point of a function is a value where . Show that if is differentiable on an interval with , then can have at most one fixed point.
Proof: If . Then
We have a contradiction.
5.3.8.
Assume is continuous on an interval containing zero and differentiable for all . If , show exists and equals .
Proof:
5.3.9.
Assume and are as described in Theorem 5.3.6, but now add the assumption that and are differentiable at , and and are continuous at with . Find a short proof for the case of L’Hospital’s Rule under this stronger hypothesis.
Proof:
5.3.10.
Let and . Using the familiar properties of these functions, compute the limit as approaches zero of .
Solution: Let . For , we have
See the stackexchange discussion.
5.3.11.
(a) Use the Generalized Mean Value Theorem to furnish a proof of the case of L’Hospital’s Rule (Theorem 5.3.6).
Proof:
Given , we can find , if ,
So we have
(b) If we keep the first part of the hypothesis of Theorem 5.3.6 the same but we assume that
does it necessarily follow that
Proof:
Since , then give , we can find , if , , so .
That means
5.3.12.
If is twice differentiable on an open interval containing and is continuous at , show
Proof: Let , then ,
Another approach:
5.4 A Continuous Nowhere-Differentiable Function
5.4.1.
and . Sketch a graph of on . Give a qualitative description of the functions
Solution: the shape of is similar to , it's just that the triangle edge is only of the . For , they are still similar to , with the edge is only of it.
5.4.2.
Fix . Argue that the series
converges and thus is properly defined.
Proof: Let
When is fixed, , so . is increasing and has upper bound, so converges.
5.4.3.
Taking the continuity of as given, reference the proper theorems from Chapter 4 that imply that the finite sum
is continuous on .
Proof: First we use Theorem 4.3.9 (Composition of Continuous Functions) to derive is continuous. Next we use Theorem 4.3.4 (Algebraic Continuity Theorem) to derive is continuous.
5.4.4.
As the graph in Figure 5.7 suggests, the structure of is quite intricate. Answer the following questions, assuming that is indeed continuous.
(a) How do we know attains a maximum value on ? What is this value?
Solution: It's a continuous function on a closed interval, so attains a maximum value . Let's calculate some values for in the following format.
The reason is for such , has only finite terms. Because when , is an even integer, so .
We first prove some properties of that will be handy.
(a) for , is odd, we can find , such that
For example .
Proof: Assume , let . Note that is even function and , then we have
Assume , let then
In both cases, we have .
(b) If , are odd, then for .
Proof: Assume , , we can find such that
So we have . Then we must have .
Since is a even function, we proved this property.
So
Let's first evaluate
Assume , let .
- If
- If
Assume , let .
- If , knowing is even, we have
- If , knowing is even, we have
Equation (1) is bounded by
We can really achive this number by setting
In fact, we can have multiple achive the maximum value. Consdier
- , we can have .
-
, we first can have , because
- Then we have .
- , we first get , then we get . This is because
So overall, we can find numbers to achieve . The maximum value should be .
(b) Let be the set of points in where attains its maximum. That is . Find one point in .
Solution: Consider where
So . We can verify it
(c) Is finite, countable, or uncountable?
Solution: I think it is uncountable. Because we can find numbers to achieve .
5.4.6.
(a) Modify the previous argument to show that does not exist. Show that does not exist.
Proof:
So
(b) Show that does not exist for any rational number of the form where and .
Proof: The idea is to choose big enough such that and are at the same segment of .
This value depends on . So when , can be , but when , . So
5.4.7.
(a) First prove the following general lemma: Let be defined on an open interval and assume is differentiable at . If and are sequences satisfying and , show
Proof:
(b) Now use this lemma to show that does not exist.
Proof: We first check some values, say . .
Then we also have , so
As we can see
is a even number when is odd, and an odd number when is even. So this sequence does not converges. Then given any , is not differentiable at .